Dodhare, Let me get your logic straight. You talked to a guy at the rally. The guy was doing some reporting. Therefore the guy you talked to wrote the article above. Huh????????????????? By the same logic: You once met a right-wing politician. George Bush is a right-wing politician. Therefore you met George Bush. Or ... Ram Kharel reported on the rally. Someone wrote the post above, regarding the rally. Therefore it must be Ram Kharel. (For the record, this is here for absurdity's sake. Obviously he didn't.) Hey, maybe, try this one. Maybe Poonte was at the rally! So we can do this "logical construction:" Poonte disagrees with you. Someone who disagrees with you wrote that article. Therefore Poonte wrote the article. How many more examples of bad conclusions from flawed facts do you want? The point is obvious. Please don't throw around accusations unless you really know. The guy you're accusing of writing the article didn't write it any more than Ram Kharel or Poonte did, so stop libeling.