I would like to oppose saying Terrorist to Maoist. That is educationally, politically and technically wrong. Here, I am not supporting to neither Maoist nor other Nepalese parties. I am not telling that King is the best Nepalese. Are Maoist Revolutionaries or Terrorists? In reality or practical real world: If anybody has brain and guts but they become victim of social suppressed and desperate by other means for long time, those people definitely stand up and do struggle against abuser people, party or government. That action of struggle is called Revolution and who do revolution is called revolutionaries, but not terrorist or terrorism. However, Corrupted and Abusers always tell terrorist. Because corrupted and abusers think that when they accused as terrorist, they will be protect by other people or nations. That is the key of telling terrorist to Nepalese Maoist Revolutionaries. Do you really think Maoists are terrorist? Do you have enough knowledge to tell Maoists terrorist? For example: If anybody becomes social victim for long time, he/she can stand up and will do struggle. He/she has to do some kind of struggle to get out from hell. That can be you, somebody, any Nepalese, or me. Then will you call yourself terrorist or a liberator revolutionary? Like US troops bombing and kill millions Iraqi for nothing with breaking International Law, but they call themselves liberator for freedom, but whoever stand against them are called terrorist.