Posted by: tired February 20, 2005
Thinking Impartially and sensibly
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
my friend, he embodies the constitution now. what he speaks is law. the constition is He He the constitution the law is His speech He the law Nepal is He He is Nepal that has been amply demostrated by his systematic rape of first the spirit and then the word, each and every word of the '91 constitution. all of this while he is protecting and furthering that constitution! take the royal commission on corruption control for example. it has a broad range of powers - including one against dissent. even beyond that it has the authority to dish out punitive action, a ruling that an be challenged only at Sarboccha. why empowering the constitutional body CIAA was not an option is beyond me. as is the need to circumvent the judiciary. but who is going to question Him?
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article