well, i say the king exceeded his limits by taking power in the manner he has. why give him a chance? why not give ourselves a chance? and dude, i did imply that george bush does not make the system, didn't i? but anyway, i don't really care if america sees a downfall. i don't remember our previous discussion but there was an opportunity, even if the king did not come to talks directly, to agree to constituent assembly. that did not happen because, and only because, the army listens to the king. really, what is the difference between the king and prachanda? if the king could benefit all, why not unite behind him? of course, but he can't. the king represents the fundamental problem, how can he benefit all? yes we should work on stopping the war. i think the king cannot stop the war. he does not have the means. he does not have the will or the vision. so, why give him a chance to turn nepal into another somalia or afghanistan where warlords rule and everyone else suffer? what do youi think can be done? i have put my ideas on the table. and dude, talking here, arguing here is necessary cause you can't do that in nepal. but yes, action is necessary.