I think, the "Murti" and 'Gaida" Kanda as Confused brought up, were associated with Dhirendra not Gayanendra. And Saroj, your point, "It's pathetic how you call my points dumb, when most of the other people in this thread agree to it," makes no sense. So if 10 people agree to a stupid idea, and 1 doesn't, does it make the idea less stupid? Not that I think what you have written here is any stupid, but just trying to see it from Confused point of view. And Confused, like you do not agree to King's move and Saroj's points, what do you think would have been the best thing in the nepali politics right now? And please be practical here, and don't just put "your fantasy utopian political democratic government" views. Shouldn't the corrupt politicians be stripped off their power to loot the country? Should they have continued to rule, with a hope of finally bringing peace as per death of thousands more, or should the Maoists have been given chance to rule? What are your options, seriously? And again be practical, and try to understand the frustration of nepalese people on the situation of the country.