Could be/ could be not. Any hard proof? "Why do you think there were .."/>
Posted by: IndisGuise February 3, 2005
Let's get organized for ANA 2005 and protest against King
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?        
"During King Birendra's rule, why do you think, he worked out with prachanda and baburam to start civil war in nepal. " -----> Could be/ could be not. Any hard proof? "Why do you think there were INDIA's BLACK CAT CoMMANDOS during the royal massacre? " ---> One word. BULL SHIT. Nothing personal. Am just attacking your statement, not you, smiply because they are just baloney. Any hard proof? There are 1000000000000000 stories regarding the second one and 1/4 for the first. Kura ta ho jata modiyo modincha, jhan tyaimathi Nepal ma. Agreed Gyane is an asshole, and a thief, who sold so many of our precious artifacts, devi deuta ko murti etc to western world. But, when he took this action, eventhough i despise him, I felt, WASN"T HE ALL POWERFUL BEFORE? WHO IN CURRENT political scenario could stop him from doing or mobilizing what he wanted. Directly or indirectly. Ekduiwota rally, dannga fasad, and girija makune ko bhasaan, but GYANE WOULD get his way. But his action this time puts him directly in the line of fire. In the sense, HE AND HE ALONE WILL BE RESPONSIBLE. He is taking a GREAT RISK, risk of of loosing his throne. What does this mofo netas got to loose. Most of their kids live outside of the nation, if not they have amasses more than plenty to live happily eva afta. Thus, by the nature of the beast alone, I think GYANE wanted to be active. Which democratically not viable, but under the situation NEPAL IS, is just the boost an average disillusioned nepalese needed. Aru kura bhaneko tyastai ho, tyasari nai ho ra tyastari nai ho ;) Aba baki break ke baad IndisGuise:)
Read Full Discussion Thread for this article