Pisces, Good to read your comment. You probably know that G Shah wants power and nothing more. He also wants to save it for his son, as well. That means he wants to suck us, our budget as much as he can. He wants his son Paras to be there after him to suck us likewise. That's all he cares about. If you want, I don't mind you calling it gang-rape, three-some, whatever... As long as these fascist kings and clans remain, the poor will suffer as long. These come to the forefront when we talk about the gang rapes. I do not know why we have Girija, but can see why we have Maoists... because these f*king bastard kings are doing whatever they like to. About poverty, been there done that, again. Today's rape you can call it just a rape or gang rape, it's up to you. There have been too many cases over the last 200 years where these bastards have bramha-looted the people and the country. I don't think I have to count the cases here: 1) Mahendra -- same as Gynendra, 2. Birendra same as Gynendra. All of them are looters in one incarnation or another. These hands have touched all soils from the east of Nepal to the west. And without being personal, you probably do not want to tell me that the current crisis would have been there had King Tribhuvan properly established a good political system, but he was one of the most bastards of all Shah kings. ALL THESE 200 YEARS THE SHAHS are gang raping the country left and right, left and right, sometimes hand-in-hand with the Ranas. Do you agree here? I'm not a politician and I'd rather not want to be one. Looking at the way politicians are running the country, it'd not take a rocket scientist to run it like that. Pisces should understand that G Shah created this scenario himself, not today but a few years ago. G Shah is talking about bucking up three more years with $$$ and then probably mean "Dekhajayega". G Shah is using Maoist issue to his advantage. On the other hand, today's politicians are not good, if you want to say that. But Today's move has tried to put a lid on everything whatever we have. I agree that democracy in Nepal has not lived up to its name. Was Panchayat any better? NO NO NO! I understood you want peace, but then how many in Nepal will get it. You are ready to trade peace for slavery? On top of it, now a simple Nepali whoever he will not have a chance at all to be a Chief of The Army or police etc. You will have to be a Shah (you missed the boat to marry Prerana if that was on your list: Hehe no offense), a Rana , a Thapa etc. That's what it means when G Shah has taken over the power. The keyword is "Chaplusi". The only hope, however untrue, is there with democracy, my dear pisces. I've to tell you the difference is the absence of concept of well-to-do in the authoritarian regimes for the common people; without concept how can you be well-to-do? Choose who you want to support, choice is yours. My choice is clear an loud now! But I do not support Girija or BP, believe me!