What I hate in religion is the stress on an individual name as the "Supreme of Supreme". How can some one be Supreme of Supreme, yes they (if they really existed) may had those good virtues and qualities that may have elevated them to a level, call it trasendental, for others to admire, follow and later worship. However, zealots genesis and intolerance breeding preaching is either a faulty or deviated philosophy, that is the root of disharmony. Talk about God, because evolution theory will never be able to explain all those co-incidences that it takes to explain life, but again competing to put one character as the Supreme is itself faulty. Whatever be the idiological basis, the first question is who is God?, then only we can fight to claim who can rightly inherit the mantle of representing God for the masses.