pepsi ज्यु तपाई लयर हो र ? i am not

if you can't help don't do गुल्ले हेइर, will help thousands of Nepali people.

they are trying to make a case using Ramos as a precedent. see --

The Ramos court concluded that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of
their claim under the APA because “a wealth of record evidence” showed that, under President
Trump, “DHS made a deliberate choice to base the TPS decision solely on whether the originating
conditions or conditions directly related thereto persisted, regardless of other current conditions no
matter how bad, and that this was a clear departure from prior administration practice.” Id. Thus, in
terminating TPS for those countries, DHS adopted a new standard that departed from long-standing
practice without any reasoned explanation, in violation of the APA. Id.
11. The Ramos court also found that the plaintiffs had raised serious questions on the
merits of their Fifth Amendment claim, which alleged that DHS’s TPS termination decisions and
departures from prior practice were motivated and influenced by racial animus against non-white,
non-European immigrants. Id.