My Name is Bahadur Thapa I'm not a watchman. ल हेर्नुस नेपालीको यत्रो बेइजत |

if you say nepal didnot exist when buddha was there...then i will say ...india existed since 15th August 1947 only. GregDai dont give any bullshit since mahabharat.. or whatever... before that india was East india company, a british empire Britain..and before that there was no india... there were different states....

Accesstimeline4 As timimerosathi puts it, I think you are either dumb or stupid or anything in between. Your reasoning skills are less than the monkey NASA is training to send to space. So please excuse me if I don't want to continue discussing with you. It is good that you deleted your statement about beheading me. LOL. At least be practical about what you say. Who knows if I am a foot taller than you and can kick your ass to another planet? I would advise you to keep your trap shut because you are only going to be making fun of yourself.

Man this is a total waste of waste of time. WTF is up with all this misguided pride ? If Indians say Buddha was born in Nepal or India would that make our Nepali people's lives better ? NOPE !!! SO WHAT THE FUGGING POINT HERE MORONS ? THE COUNTRY'S BUCKLED TO ITS KNEES... MANCHEY HARU LAI EEK CHAG KHANAA DHAU DHAU CHA YO GADHA HARU LAI YESTOOO CHAINEY NACHAINEY KURAAA KO ARGUMENT. NO WONDER THE COUNTRY IS IN SUCH A FUGGED UP STATE. NEPALI PEOPLE HAVE THEIR PRIORITIES ALLLLL FUGGED UP. AND THIS IS A GOOD EXAMPLE OF WASTE OF TIME AND ENERGY.

That is egg jacktly my point.

being a foot taller doesnt mean that you are intelligent. and by the way i did not say i would behead you, i said i would if anyone... whoever that be.. would post such a videos or comments that puts Nepalese morale down. and by the way by the way whatever i said in my post was not dumb and not practical... ... and listen..i will once again say "Nepal as of today, existed long before there was india..." Bathroom coffee, i am not messed up in my priorities to keep discussing on these topics with these messed up people but you have to respond the act that comes and interferes your priorities.

elaborate....

what a waste of time...had you people invested even a slight portion of your obsession at display on trying to find a way to improve the lives of nepali people we would have a better life. Interfering with priorities? dude you need to wake up and stop trying to prove what has already been proven and accepted. what more do you want? have the international community not recognized lumbini, which is NOW a part of NEPAL, to be the rightful birthplace of Buddha?? the burden of disproving that fact is upon the INDIANS who are trying to say otherwise...why should we even be bothered by such lunacy?

i agree with you... but my concern is about the video that was in this thread... this is demoralizing.

Learn from the Buddha. Why does it bother you if it's not true? Even if it's true, you should have accepted it and moved on.

this person grgDai is trying to convince all of us that buddha was not born in Nepal. Are you RAW agent dog; trying to brainwash sajha users using Nepali name?

Rationale are you dumb? Can you read? What does this mean "But yes, when I argue that bodhisatwa was attained in India, I am only trying to explain how the state of the mind of "buddha" was born in india. Obviously it is a known fact that Siddhartha Gautam who later became known as the Buddha was born in Lumbini I never denied that " Take a chill pill.

It hurt me when I watched the video. Then again I thought I shouldn't generalize Indians based on some individuals' comedy. I laughed many times when Santosh Panta made serveral dhoti jokes. I feel bad now. We should learn from these videos and do something positive for our country. As long as our country condition does't improve, we will be always associated with such bad names regardlesss of our personal success. I'm proud of Nepal and Nepalese. I keep hearing lots of nice stories of Nepali workers being loyal and trustworthy. We shouldn't let that image of ours shatter no matter what. This image has been maintained for generations and it should continue. On the other hand, we won't remember this cheap video after a couple of months. BTW, Buddhism started some 500 years after Buddha's death. Buddha taught dhamma, law of nature, which is always true, nonsecterian, and timeless and so it is called sanatan dharma. There were many sects during the time of Buddha and he was not interested in them. Tripitak that contains Buddha's teachings doesn't have a signle word about "Buddhism". Unfortunately, after his death, his so called followers started sect called buddhism. True Buddha followers are those who practice sila (five percepts), samadhi (control thier minds), and panna (purify their minds) and walk in the path of liberation. If we are really proud of Buddha, we should follow his teachings -- art of living, way of life, code of conduct, rewarding in this life and life after this.

Normal 0 MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";} Dear Grgdai, Looks like you are determined to prove what I am saying. Please read carefully my first reply to you. let me explain now In my first reply I have countered your statement that says Nepal didn't exists at the time of Buddha, and for that I gave you reference. I haven't talked about the boundary. Debating existence of a country is one thing and debating its boundaries is different thing and in your first statement you haven’t touched the word boundary. Now you want to drag the debate without coming to the conclusion of the existence of Nepal. The debate was not about the boundary instead it was about the existence of the country. When you start something be clear about the concepts it will help you a lot in future. My second counter was about you stating that the knowledge Buddha was attained in India. I countered you saying following you own logic you can not say knowledge Buddha was not attained in India because at that time country called India didn't exists ( this was not my logic I was following you logic which says that country Nepal didn't exists) and if it exists I requested you to give me proof. here I was playing your logic against you. Instead of giving me the proof you came with the Mahabharata and about the controversy of origin of the word Nepal. Following your own logic I gave with proof that debate about the existence is different and controversy about the name of a the country is different, for this I cited the example of china. and for Mahabharata I told you with example how ambiguous is the Mahabharata. Here again you failed to conclude then you started new point about the boundaries. Your debating style is like that of Nepali political leaders talking for two years and failing to come up with a constitution. This is what happens when the concept is not clear and sticking to own logic valid or invalid. Now regarding to “I have noted that your thoughts are very rigid and mechanic and lacks flexibility To counter this I am using your own logic like in previous replies. In my first reply there was “either’ “or” already two options. I may have given you more but that was the conclusion came after reading your post. After reading your second reply to me I added third own that also shows flexibility.providing three possibilities is not a sign of rigidity but sign of flexibility. Till now I have not touched the subject where Buddha was born, I do not want to go to other topics unless we conclude the first three that is 1. Existence of Nepal, 2. Existence of India and 3. Enlightenment of Buddha in India . Otherwise the debate becomes clueless and this forum will become like constitution assembly of Nepal, “Raat bhari karayo, dakchina harayoo? I just want to point you something which might be helpful to you. Not cross examining your logic for different statement you put forward will give your opponent to cancel your argument with your own logic without a delay. Remember that till now I haven’t argued on any thing except for three things which I have mentioned above. And now to friend Homlal You are right my friend. At the time of his death Buddha said don’t worship my idol just follow the teachings. But followers did the opposite. Not only that, some of the followers even created the authority like Dalai Lama. On the other hand, for average people like us it is very difficult to follow great path. I want to follow footsteps of Bill Gates (I am serious here) I even don’t know how, forget about Bill Gates I tried to follow this Nepali guy Mahato unable to do that either. Looks like it is easy to follow a crook person than great persons. Last edited: 20-Apr-10 04:32 PM Last edited: 20-Apr-10 08:22 PM