For those bashing for a decision of Nepal making secular state.

It is not the question of nepal was or wasnt. You can see how this new decsion of govenment has stirred up the issue of religion in sajha and people are fighting with each other . this issue should have been never brought forwarded.

Why not? Nepal was not a hindu state. The issue has already been there.

I somewhat agree with Bidhan, not that I don't support the recent development. I think the timing could have been better; the constitution assembly could have revised this provision. It seems politically motivated this time, whereas we are trying to seperate politics with religion (ofcourse that is impossible).
I am still wondering how we went about changing all these provisions in constitution without a formal ammendment or complete rewrite. I thought we had to wait until we elect the constitution assembly which would formulate the new constitution. If we are rejecting the current constitution, does that mean we are a nation without a formal constitution right now?

It's true that they're doing the changes on their will. Maoists also blamed for not consulting with them. It was also not discussed in the parliament, but was hastened for passing it.