[Show all top banners]

1whocandie4u
Replies to this thread:

More by 1whocandie4u
What people are reading
Subscribers
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 US apologizes with Nepal.......
[VIEWED 5328 TIMES]
SAVE! for ease of future access.
Posted on 08-17-06 8:05 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

last time, we read Prof. avi Subedi's article, here, it seems that ambassador is moving his ass to tell something. Read This out:
http://kantipuronline.com/kolnews.php?&nid=83076

US visa services: Anything but 'indifferent'

By James F Moriarty

A recent column on applying for a US visa ("Visa & empire of indifference" by Abhi Subedi, Aug 9, 2006) sparked a wave of letters to the editor agreeing with the author's observations and sometimes offering their own interpretations of why some applicants are denied visas. As my country's envoy to Nepal, I wish to weigh in on this discussion.

First things first: The US Mission to Nepal is anything but "indifferent" to the thousands of Nepali applicants who annually seek visas to visit the United States. Our Consular section regularly conducts public outreach - through media and especially to student audiences - to explain our visa process and warn applicants to avoid paying unnecessary fees to unscrupulous "consultants" who falsely claim they can secure a US visa. Working with colleagues from the US Educational Foundation in Nepal (the Fulbright Commission), the Consular Section is holding just such a session for students in our American Center Library this today afternoon.

And speaking of students, Nepal had 4,861 studying in the US in 2004-2005. This was almost an 11 percent increase over 2003-2004. According to the Institute of International Education, Nepal ranked 23rd in the world among nations sending students to study in the US. We welcome this development, and it's worth noting our consular officers in Nepal helped these young people by interviewing and issuing visas to them.

During the people's movement in April, when we had to close our Consular section because of security concerns, our Mission dispatched two consular officers for several weeks to our Embassy in New Delhi to help those Nepali applicants who needed a visa urgently. There was no requirement that we do this. Our Consular chief - displaying the opposite of indifference - proposed this step as a helpful customer service, and I immediately endorsed it.

Moreover, after the Consular section reopened in early May, it went into overdrive to conduct more than 1,000 interviews in a single week to ensure applicants would not face extended waits for an appointment for an interview.

Interviewing and adjudicating visa applications are difficult tasks and, as the original column on this topic noted, "The reality is that no country can give [a] visa to every applicant." Our consular officers work hard to treat each applicant with fairness and respect. Yet they do so within the framework of the US Immigration and Naturalization Act, passed by our Congress. This law charges every consular officer to assume that every visa applicant is an intending immigrant - unless the applicant can convince the officer otherwise. This means that if an applicant for a student or other non-immigrant visa is actually seeking to "flee the turbulent 'motherland'," as mentioned in the original column, then the applicant is misrepresenting his or her purpose and must be denied.

While every applicant can re-apply for a visa, our Consular section recommends they wait until their life circumstances have changed before doing so. Our consular officers regularly advise refused applicants what they can do to improve their chances to receive a visa in the future. If a denied applicant follows this advice and reapplies with success, we welcome this result. Still, we caution denied applicants that, in most cases, significant time and a change in one's life circumstances are required for this to happen.

I can assure your readers that, when it comes to issuing visas, there is no "indifference" on our part. We seek to facilitate exchanges of all kinds between Nepal and the United States, and our issuance of US visas is central in this process. We take this responsibility seriously, and strive to make the process as transparent and fair as possible. But it is hard work. Our small Consular section - six officers - conducted more than 17,000 interviews for all types of non-immigrant visas in 2005. These numbers will likely increase in 2006. This means consular officers must work hard to come to the correct decision regarding issuance of a visa as quickly as possible.

As Ambassador, I take a keen interest in our Consular section's operation. I am proud of the work of its Nepali and American staff. Day in and day out, they perform a first-rate job. Yet, like most of us, our staff know they are not perfect and welcome opportunities to improve their performance. They know mistakes can occasionally happen. This appears to have been the case in the application by Professor Subedi, long a cultural contact of our American Center, and we regret it.

(The writer is the US Ambassador to Nepal.)
 
Posted on 08-17-06 8:11 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

do you have a link for that prof's article
 
Posted on 08-17-06 8:21 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

sandai here is the link:
http://sajha.com/sajha/html/openThread.cfm?forum=2&ThreadID=34882
 
Posted on 08-17-06 8:48 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

That was not an apology, its a clarification rather.
 
Posted on 08-17-06 12:09 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

it doesnt sound like an apology!
 
Posted on 08-17-06 1:31 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

ok, that might be not the apology, nevertheless, he regrets at the bottom of the article (.......and we regret it.)......sorry for wrong title........."Malai Maf Gari Deu la Mitra Ho"
 
Posted on 08-17-06 1:40 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

That's a standard statement, mistake is inevitable, and so no harm quoting that sentence. It's a part of diplomacy.

The Ambassador is teling all the nepalese through this article that Nepal doesn't have intellectuals/writers who can see various facets of the situation.. they keep on ranting their stupid was of looking from only their own angle.
 
Posted on 08-17-06 1:58 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 
 
Posted on 08-17-06 4:28 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

खोइ महामहिम राज्दुत ले त्यहाँ Kantipur marfat स्पष्टिकरण दिनु पर्ने कुरा केही देख्दिन म त । तर किन त्यो लेख् लेख्नु भा होला कुन्नि? Each country has its own visa policies. Why hue and cry by original writer??
 
Posted on 08-17-06 5:35 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

It tells a lot about the author when his article compels the US Ambassador to Nepal come up with a "clarification" stating that the Ambassador regrets about what happened.
 
Posted on 08-17-06 5:51 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

It would be interesting to know on what ground was professor subedi's visa rejected. generally consulars do explain the reason.

the letter from moriarty is a diplomatic one but he does seem to be regretful over what he explicitly says "appears to be a mistake". hence it does sound like a letter of apology in that sense.

there is nothing wrong in complaining and expressing dissatisfaction over someone or an institution in democracy. professor subedi is a scholar and a well read gentleman and it did seem rather strange and inconspicuous to hear that his visa got rejected.

LooTe
 
Posted on 08-17-06 8:02 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

अर्काको देशले भिषा दिएन भनेर के को गनगन गर्ने?

अभि सर जस्तो देशको मुर्धन्य व्यक्तित्वलाई भिसा नदिने काण्ड बाट प्रेरणा लिएर अमेरिका स्थित नेपालि राजदुतावासले पनि कम से कम १-२% मात्रको भए पनि नेपालि भिषाको अमेरिकिहरुको दरखास्त अस्वीकृत गरेर देखाए त हुने नि !

मोरियार्टि वाजे को कस्तो खासाको तर्क, नेपालिहरु चाँहि अन्यथा प्रमाण नभएमा सवै बेकम्मा देश भगौडा ! अनि नेपालले मात्र सवै अम्रिकानेलाई रेड कार्पेट किन ओछ्याउनु?

तर कुरो को चुरो त उहि हो नि! देश कंगाल भए सि सप्पै ले हेप्ने भैहाले नि !
 


Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

YOU CAN ALSO



IN ORDER TO POST!




Within last 30 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
TPS Re-registration case still pending ..
मन भित्र को पत्रै पत्र!
emergency donation needed
Guess how many vaccines a one year old baby is given
अमेरिकामा बस्ने प्राय जस्तो नेपालीहरु सबै मध्यम बर्गीय अथवा माथि (higher than middle class)
Travelling to Nepal - TPS AP- PASSPORT
ढ्याउ गर्दा दसैँको खसी गनाउच
TPS Reregistration and EAD Approval Timeline.......
nrn citizenship
Morning dharahara
1974 AD Pinjadako Suga Remixed
Susta Susta Degree Maile REMIXED version
Elderly parents travelling to US (any suggestions besides Special Assistance)?
कल्लाई मुर्ख भन्या ?
जाडो, बा र म……
Changing job after i-140 approval
lost $3500 on penny stocks !!!
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters