यो तितो सत्य हेर्न नबिर्सनु होला

http://titosatya.co.cc/2008/Tito_satya_December-18-2008.php

लौ हेरौ तितो सत्य :)

Listen to the recorded phone conversation:

http://www.dainikee.com/news/index.php?action=news_details&news_id=2889

He is not alone. There must be others in this chain of events. Dhamala has a lot connection. I want Dhamala to vomit all kind of relations with all kind of people: Prachanda, Ranbir, Indian Embassy, .....

Hillarious interview from Mr. Dhamala. (dhamala ko churifuri herawoo sathi ho)

http://www.dcnepal.net/Interview/rishi_dhamala.htm

यो प्रतिकृया ऋषी धमला को पक्ष मा पनि होइन, बिपक्षमा पनि होइन। अल्पत्रकारहरु जम्मै पत्रकार हुने देशमा ऋषी धमलाहरु जन्मिनु अनी रातारात हुर्किनु, तिनै को बैशाखिमा राजनीति गर्नु अस्वाभाबिक होइन। सुनिन्छ १० कक्षा समेत पास नगरेका धमला ले राजनैतिक संरक्षणमा नै वरीष्ठ पत्रकार भए।

तर आज बर्तमान सरकार को एउटा निकायले जुन आरोपमा गिरफ्तार गर्‍यो हास्यस्पद छ नै। हातहतियार खरखजाना एन अन्तर्गत। ऋषी धमला बिरुद्ध हातहतियार अबैध राखेको प्रमाणित गर्न मुश्किलाई होला। फिरौती, धम्की, जबर्जस्ती उसुलिमा भए जायज हुन सक्ला।

भारतीय दूतबास को हन्दी खाने भनिएका धमला बिरुद्ध अन्य खालको मुद्दा लगाउदा ठुला शक्ती केन्द्र र दूतबास को प्रेसर मा केही गर्न नसक्ने भएकोले हात हतियार र बिद्रोही को मतियार जस्तो संबेदन्शिल मुद्दा लगाएको हुनु पर्दछ, ताकी उनको समर्थन गर्नेहरु समेत आतंकारी घोषणा हुने डर ले अगाडि आउन नसकोस।

तर यो सरकार आँफै आतंककारीहरु को हो कि होइन? बहस को बिषय छ। प्रचण्ड, बाबुराम आँफैले बन्दूक बोकेको हो कि होइन? अझै पनि बन्दूक बोक्ने चम्चाहरु साथ लिएर हिड्छन कि हिड्दैनन। संसद भवन भित्रै हतियार शाहीत प्रबेश गरेको हो कि होइन? हातहतियार खरखजना एन अन्तर्गत तिनलाई पनि गिरफ्तार गर्ने कि?

कतै यी फोटोहरुमा ऋषी धमला त छैनन?

यहाँ छ कि, ऋषी धमला  ?

 त्यहा छ कि,ऋषी धमला  ?

उता छ कि, ऋषी धमला  ?

'so called intellectuals' haru ajhai pani Rishi Dhamala thik chha bhandai hideko dekhda udek laagchha. aafno agadi bomb padkaauna uksaune, jabarjasti chanda asuli gana lagaune haru khuleaam hideka chhan ani kasailai samatyo bhane yo ta sabaile garne kura ho yo sarkar le pani pahila gareko thiyo bhanera unmukti khojne haru pani chhan ajhai?

yi maoist harulaai tyati belako sarkar le paaeko bhae ta aaiya pani bhanna napaai bepatta banaauthyo dhanna ahile ko police le hakim palda jhai palera rakheko chha.

haathatiyar liera hidne, jabarjasti chanda asul garne jasta karyama sanlagna jo kohi lai pani praman sahit bhetema mudda haina sojhai goli thoknu parchha. chor bharatiya dalal haru.

Desire for conspicuity and uncontrolled conceit never mars one’s professional ability. However, care should be taken when one is catapulted to a degree of elites and is considered as a role model. I care least about Nepal’s politics because it is not worth having an opinion if I cannot make a difference. Considering this fact, and an ignorant person I am, I do not know the extent of Rishi’s contribution towards Nepal’s press. I only know that he has come across me, a layman, as a haughty and power hungry individual, who is keener in establishing relations with celebrities and political leaders which I doubt, is for a selfless motif.

Again, considering our own ethos and our own ambiguous judgment to believe Nepalese press, choreographing oneself to be another Rishi alike should not be difficult. It is easy to pander to political leaders, and it is easier to pander the rest of the Nepalese people. As I compare Rishi to elite journalists like Dixit brothers, Ashutosh Tiwari and Narayan Wagle, he simply fails to impress. His interviews fall short of depicting himself as a mere humble individual, let alone a classy journalist.

In reply to Rahuldai’s comment above, I partially agree with him because Rishi would perhaps get away with everything just like Prachanda and Baburam did. But then, they were hardcore leftists and religiously followed the set of guidelines of communism, although I decry their radical approach, I at least consider them honest to some extent. In Rishi’s case, he is merely a reporter who, I believe should have never put himself in unfamiliar territory other than journalism.

His interviews are trite and mannerisms affected. Despite his professional brilliance (if it is at all), he still needs an ounce of humility to establish himself as a credible reporter. He has failed us once again and made us look like a pack of fools who always believed in whatever Dixie he whistled. Another one just joined a club of liars, what can I say more?