Baburam Bhattarai in Washington Post - Sajha Mobile
SAJHA MOBILE
Baburam Bhattarai in Washington Post
Posts 6 · Viewed 5128 · Go to Last Post
Jawala
· Snapshot
Like · Likedby · 0

Future of aid flow concerns Nepal

(Contact)
Thursday, October 16, 2008

Baburam Bhattarai, Nepal's new finance minister, can appreciate the irony.

Even as the onetime Maoist insurgent struggles to modernize the economy of his poor, landlocked Asian nation, the world's greatest champion of free markets and free enterprise is preparing a massive taxpayer bailout of its collapsing stock and credit markets.

"I think the U.S. is moving toward socialism and we are moving to capitalism," he joked in a luncheon interview with editors and reporters at The Washington Times this week.

Mr. Bhattarai, named finance minister in the communist-dominated government that took office in August, said Nepal's relative isolation from the global economy has been a blessing in disguise given the current world financial turmoil. More than two-thirds of Nepal's 29 million people work in agriculture and officials are still trying to rebuild the basics of the economy after a lengthy civil war that resulted in the abolition of the monarchy in April.

"The world economic crisis will affect everybody. Nobody is immune from this," said Mr. Bhattarai, in Washington for the annual meetings of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.

But he added that the pain may be less for countries like Nepal.

"My own feeling is we are in a periphery economy. Our economy is mostly agricultural and non-monetary, so it is not as integrated with the world economy," he said.

In addition, India, which is by far Nepal's biggest trading partner, also appears to be relatively sheltered from the global economic unrest.

But Mr. Bhattarai said he is concerned that a possible global recession could mean a decline in financial assistance, both from international institutions like the IMF and from individual donors like the United States. The government is seeking nearly $400 million in donor aid to meet its budget plans, he told World Bank and IMF officials over the weekend.

"We have an agenda to develop our industrial economy that we are focusing on," he said. But he said the country wants to promote small enterprise and rural development, a mixed strategy he called "walking with two legs."

He added that Nepal, home to eight of the world's 10 highest mountains, including Mount Everest, is banking on a revival of tourism now that it has achieved political stability.

He noted that even during the worst of the fighting between the government and the Maoist insurgency, "there was not a single foreign national who was harmed."

The IMF last week forecast economic growth of 5.5 percent for Nepal in 2009, far below the double-digit growth rates of other Asian tigers in recent years, but above the estimated 3 percent to 4 percent growth for 2007 and 2008 as Nepal emerged from more than a decade of civil strife.

Mr. Bhattarai said the government's new budget has established six development priorities: agriculture, hydro- power, infrastructure, education, health and industry.

He acknowledged the government still had reservations about economic globalization and the danger that small, poor countries like Nepal could be dominated by large multinational companies.

"On this issue, we do have reservations, but we need investment, we need capital," he said. "So there has to be a balance."

 Keith Smiley/The Washington Times Nepal Foreign Minister Baburam Bhattarai joked: "I think the U.S. is moving toward socialism and we are moving to capitalism."

Located between Asia's two booming superpowers, China and India, Mr. Bhattarai said Nepal was watching closely the strengthening of ties between Washington and New Delhi, including the just-approved U.S.-India civilian nuclear agreement. He said Katmandu has long looked to the United States to counter the pressure it receives from its giant neighbors.

"When the U.S. moves closer to India, it tends to be a bad thing for Nepal," he said. "India's policy [for the region] will be the U.S. policy, and the result will not be a balanced package."

- http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/16/future-of-aid-flow-concerns-Nepal/

ganapati
· Snapshot
Like · Liked by · 0
"When the U.S. moves closer to India, it tends to be a bad thing for Nepal,"
.. at least he has guts to speak truth, eventhough its against India.

"I think the U.S. is moving toward socialism and we are moving to capitalism,"
..like his humor, but he should make sure he shouldn't only be a joker.
caseyindc
· Snapshot
Like · Liked by · 0

This article is from the Washington Times, not the Washington Post.

Nepe
· Snapshot
Like · Liked by · 0

"I think the U.S. is moving toward socialism and we are moving to capitalism,"

 

Socialism for the super-rich would have been a better allegory and a point.

 

Among the few particularly interesting things Baburam revealed (at the airport after reaching Nepal) was that Maoists have been discussing about changing the name of their party.

 

Obviously there are people who are opposed to such idea.

 

http://www.kantipuronline.com/kolnews.php?&nid=163809

 

I think a name palatable to the mass and the international community would help Maoist a lot.

 

I think one of the reasons UML never could get to the power or sustain it when it got chance despite having the potential superiority over NC was it’s name that was unpalatable to the world community. It’s not that UML leadership did not consider changing its name. They did. But it did not materialize and now it is probably too late, too untimely.

 

In case of Maoist, however, this is a perfect time. The party is in its transformative stage. So it is in the best position to absorb the internal shock such changes might bring to the party.

 

If they miss this chance, there won’t be another one, just like there is not one for UML anymore.

 

Nepe  
gurkha's
· Snapshot
Like · Liked by · 0

HAHAHA

Its like changing the color of a DONKEY to make them HORSE...........

chyantu
· Snapshot
Like · Liked by · 0

I just have this simple question,

Are all other economists of nepal dead, so that maoists have to put a freaking

architect as the new Finance Minister. He deserves to be in the Ministry of Physical

Planning , where he would be reconstructing what they have demolished in these years.

and

Dr. Bhattarai, what happened to your boasting when u used to criticize other parties

for thier dependence on international funds?

now u joined the list of beggars, pleading for international help, and your budget wont be a

success unless u put some merciful tears on your face.

you guys are eager to support from a country(US) which once u guys used to castigate as the evil

leader of the world and symbol of imperialism and capitalism and blah blah ..

now both u and prachanda are proud to be in the same country and Bush now seems a savior to u guys

u guys are revealing your true colors,

i feel sorry that more than 13000 ppl lost their lives and 10 fold ppl are suffering , only

coz of the greed you guys possessed,

u guys are destroying my little hope of getting back to Nepal and may be lot others,

hope u feel better now,

 

 

 
Please log in to reply to this post

You can also log in using your Facebook
View in Desktop
What people are reading
You might like these other discussions...
· Posts 2 · Viewed 298
· Posts 7 · Viewed 1277 · Likes 1
· Posts 5 · Viewed 571
· Posts 79 · Viewed 19287 · Likes 19
· Posts 1 · Viewed 128
· Posts 2 · Viewed 327
· Posts 1 · Viewed 84
· Posts 1 · Viewed 94
· Posts 1 · Viewed 195
· Posts 1 · Viewed 185



Your Banner Here
Travel Partners
Travel House Nepal