Your boss prachanda who drives in a stolen car has power to drive the country forward.

Guys,lets say, we got a chance to punish Prachandra..suppose u did halal to him.Wat's gonna happen next?

Will maoist be eradicated?Prachandra alone is not a maoist...He is the leader or the person leading the group.If he is gone,another will come.That force still persists..So,wat I am trying to imply is,it seems that he has caliber to unify and guide the people.Maoist cadres killed lot of innocent people..its not good.I can understand the sentiments of the family.I am not saying that Maoist are doin all good.Look,those cadres got gun and they are using improperly...that happens for all.I mean, if u look at the police and army,they have killed a lot of innocent people.I don't know if u ever have been mistreated by army,police...but I have been a lot.In chitwan,on my way to college,one army kicked a old man on bicycle just because he crossed 3 inch of allocated line.That man got a severe haemorrahage on head.there are a lot of these kinds of incidents...One thing ,I am not trying to evalutae the atrocities of those parties and finally sum up the acts of Maoist are justifiable.Did u ever know Pyar jung thapa,Prachandra killing people.There are some stupid cadres in lower level who thinks that they can do anything......

    Its not the time to evaluate Maoist right now.We should try to bring some positive change in Nepal using that force.Of all the parties,Maoist can create pressure to the govt and they can change the direction of wind.NC was frightened of republic before.If we see theirs party mandate,there was no republic.They start changing because of the pressure from maoist.So,Kisun ji who  was front man of the party is saying he has no conncetion with NC.If we think,why was it necessary to change the mainstream?Because time has changed...and the messenger of change is MAOIST.

Secret,

Na Tokne Kukur Dherai Bhukcha..

Timro Uncle haru kasto cha ta.......

La vana....

I am  predicing  that he will be shot dead by his former cadet or may YCL.

The way Maoists were trying to gain the support of the people was by no means appropriate. Prachanda has already admitted several times that they would not be gaining their political purpose with the help of arms. Whatever YCLs are doing now is just another attempt to rationalize their past deeds only. They don't have any political and economic adenda, to be very frank. Prachanda admires the developement in Switzerland and Dev Gurung assures Nepalese entepreneurs that they will not be nationalizing any industries. They have been shy to expressly say that whatever way they fought in the past was their mistakes and they are ready to go along the capitalistic way with socialist flavor. Then what is new in their agenda. Hishila Yami presented the road map during her ministership to build railways, eastwest highways, north-south highways, so on and so forth. If she knew and believed nothing could be acheived from this capitalistic way of government, what was the purpose of preseting the road map? Therefore, frens, let Maoists realize and land safely rather than provoking and making them go back. However, one thing is undeniable that maoists have also played major roles in throwing the King and Kingship into such dilapidated conditions. 

Hinakkali bhaneko thik ho...

maobadi=indiabadi murdaabaad murdaaabaad....

Here is a column from NY based CJ Thapa, who appears to be quite critical in his elaboration. Its nice to see columnist like Mr. Thapa who would think first and draw later.

Few excerpts...

“....Many also feel that India has practiced a dominating and destabilizing policy when it comes to the internal affairs of its weaker neighbouring states. Moreover, there are many Nepalis who believe that India is looking for an opportune moment to repeat the Sikkim-like conquest with Nepal.”

“Regardless of India's understanding of such dynamics, however, Indian intent vis-à-vis Nepal has been ambiguous and difficult to speculate. While remaining mute over the Bhutanese autocracy, the authoritarian government of Maldives and even supporting the dictatorial junta of Burma and Bangladesh, India's interest in restoration of democracy in Nepal looks awkward and sinister.”

“What is even more sinister is the Indian policy of supporting the Maoists, the political parties and to a certain extent even the monarchy. It is no secret that while on one hand India had declared the Maoists as terrorists even before Nepal did, India was surreptitiously playing host to the Maoist leadership through most of the insurgency years. Also, it was only after the Indian nod of approval that the Monarch took charge from the political parties. But on the other hand, it was India that brokered a deal between the parties and the Maoists and then abetted their alliance to oust the Monarch from power. Even more strangely, one of the reasons why the current ruling alliance has been unable to completely abolish the monarchy can be attributed to the Indian nay.”

If you want all...