royal massacre 2001, nepal, a nightmare
Hello everyone,
You'll need to read "Rakta Kunda" written by Krishna Abiral then you'll be crysta lcreared who did it.
it's good that they are dead.
THere is nothing to debate, its the game of gyanendra !!!!!!!!! that's all we should know, whoever killed the late king.
Wellll Suike, we neither know dipendra nor paras.. but we have heard and read of thier public life...i assume as a well informed nepali you are aware or paras ko chartikala haru!! getting drunk, bitting up people, killing them had been his past.. sooo a person who could do that in public, can do anything in the palace...
Again, its only my sixth sense.. but at times, u dont need sixth sense, yu just need common sense..and i believe most of nepali;s common sense still refuses to believe that dipendra planned it all.....
as for the well educated logic, i know Dipendra went to Eton... where did PAras go? i know he went to BKHS for +2 but how about after that???
suike saathi, its the matter of trust... u prolly wont have long logic to back it up with, but ur heart still doesnt agree to something...
sooooo my sixth sense and first sense all say that it needs to be well investigated and every single nepali has the right to know the truth about it!!!!!
I have a few pronlems.
Video 2 has a background song ish duniya mein
2) How come Kkamal Dixit knows so much. Did he sleep with the Queen herself or what? 3) Notice how drugs and abd ganja has been used to make the price look bad.
Overall it’s a propaganda for sure.
The surviving royal family members were watched when interviewed.
Looks like Indian propaganda
welll i agree on some of the stuff... but really, i would be glad if somebody proves the matter of the fact.. with all good evidences... right now we are just using our logic and sense (common or sixth).... hope somebody really goes deep into the matter and solves it... also hope we get to know the truth during our lifetime only!!!
.
King Kong is made in Hollywood....
.
This is just one part of the story. Does any body have other part of the coin?????
.
This is a movie ..
.........not a documentary...a show
.............. a puppet show
.
.
See the diference..
.
काही नभ्एको जात्रा हादिगाउमा !
पानी मुनिको ओभनो बन्नका लागि फेरी नयाँ उपाय रछ्न थालेजस्तो छ!
जस्ले पनि सहजै थाहा पाउनसक्छ!
स्टोरी त जेजे बनाए पनि हुन्छ !कशओ ?
माकुरा ले जालो जस्हृ नि बुन्छ कस्लाइ थाहा छैन र ?
अब जनता ले छोड्ने छैनन जयन मारा हरुलाइ !
खबर दार बनाउती कुरो कहिले नि लास्तीनग हुँदैन!
यो भिदियो ले अब केके गर्ने हो बिचार गर माओवादी सरकार
Does any one have any problem accepting the fact that Dipendra did it all? If so, why?
- we should not forget the blames on him (may be rumors) that he used to be in drugs all the time.
- There was a very bad news about him in Eton, where he had to apologize with a royal girl.
- His name was always attached with drugs
- Never heard of good word about him.
I have no doubt in my mind that this royal massacre was carried out by Dipendra.
If you refute on this argument, please do so with logicially.
Kiran
the logic is that all truth has been burried by gyane himself
this is the best logic.
I am so surprized such a majority of nepalese think it was not Dipendra. Just because he went to Eton college, does not mean he is educated. I dont think he even passed. And the only reason he passed at the university in Nepal is coz his father is KIng!!! Obviously they cannot fail him.
Noone liked Dipendra when he was living, and now that he is dead, he is suddenly God and incapable of commiting murder...
Educated people are capable of murder too! FYI
nepalihottie, ok i agree that even eduacated people can commit crime.. but do u have any proof tht dipendra did it?? if i m not mistaken, every law says a person is innocent until proven guilty...soooo.. there is nothing we can do but wait for the proof to be revealed.. until then, if u believe dipendra did it,thats ur believe... i dont believe it.. in the free world, we are entitled to ahve our own opinion right??
I am not trying to prove he did it.. But you cannot fully rule out the possibility that maybe what they are saying is infact true! Just coz everyone hates Paras, you cant just blame him. There is no proof against him either.
Dipendra by the way, flunked out of Eton College.
What does it matter at this stage? No offense to those who like/support the King, but Monarchy for all intents and purposes has been relegated to the history. It sure would be nice to find out the real truth (if it is different from what we know) but I see that as having little bearing on the course the country had chartered for itself.
Just a thought.
it really was disturbing.
.
दरबारी हत्याका हत्याराहरु सबै जिबितै छन...........
खुलेयाम सडकमा हिड्दै छन.............................
मृतकका संपतिका पछि लाग्दै छन......................
भाग्न गन्तब्य दीशा खोज्दै छन्..........................
जहां गए नि सुख भने अबश्य पाउने छैनन्..............
Captain Haddock,
It matters. If we seek the rationale of US bombing Nagasaki (more than half a decade ago), we certainly can seek the reason, proof and logic behin royal massacre which is not even a decade old. Also, the question of relevancy of monarchy in Nepal is quite a seperate topic. The monarchy may be abolished in just two months time frame (if CA verdict say so), still this question of Royal massacre will be an open question. This is an open question to the then security system of Nepal, the then judiciary system of Nepal. Any competent government should solve this unsolved mystry. Even though this mystry happened inside the iron walls where public can not reach, there certainly was law of land. Even if the monarchy's window to public was limited, still the monarcy was constitutinal.
It is not that we are going to find all the proof in this thread. DIfferent people have different opinion and more than that different people have different reasoning/ logical deduction.
Kiran
Please log in to reply to this post
You can also log in using your Facebook
