If I was in his position I would have asked 100 billion rupees.
His intention were very clear demanding 2 billion because government can not pay and will not pay. The second option for government is to find the murderer and get justice.
Now home minister sying that there is no evidence: there are still evidence to prove guilty.
Now media is just twisting the Nanda Prasad's sacrifice.
Last edited: 29-Sep-14 08:30 PM
Our country politician don't have any humanity. This guy died for a cause and Gautam Ji made such a worst story that would just make me feel so bad. If you could not do anything for the guy, at least don't come up with these sissy excuses. I don't even have words to write for this stupid ass. How do these people look at mirrors everyday. God save people from people like this.
http://www.nepalnews.com/index.php/news/39564-nanda-prasad-asked-for-rs-2-billion-to-end-hunger-strike-dpm-gautam
Nanda Prasad asked for Rs 2 billion to end hunger strike: DPM Gautam
Published on Sunday, 28 September 2014 14:37 Nepalnews Hits: 3576
10 Comments
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Home Affairs, Bamdev Gautam has said that late Nanda Prasad Adhikari had asked for Rs 2 billion as a pre-condition to end his hunger strike-unto-death.
Deputy PM Bamdev Gautam. (File Photo)
Deputy PM Bamdev Gautam. (File Photo)
“It was not possible for the government to pay such a huge amount of money. We tried for several times to end his strike. But his demands kept on increasing. That’s why we could not save his life,” Gautam said addressing a meeting of Social Justice and Human Rights Committee of the Legislature-Parliament on Sunday.
DPM Gautam further claimed that the government could not take further action against the alleged murderers of Adhikari’s son, Krishna Prasad, in absence of adequate evidence.
“Despite our wish, we could not bring the culprits to legal net and it led to the tragic death of Nanda Prasad,” conceded DPM Gautam.
Among the alleged culprits, one has already died during armed conflict, while another one is living in Britain, the DPM said. “We have legal complications to proceed a case against the second culprit, as allegation against him has not yet been vindicated by Nepal’s court of law. The other alleged culprits, too, were released on bail due to the lack of sufficient proofs.”
Some human rights activists approached Adhikari and his wife Ganga Maya urging them to continue with the strike, the DPM recalled. “The activists said if former prime ministers visit the agitating couple, they might agree to end strike. All former PMs went to visit the couple. Instead, Nanda Prasad shouted and yelled at former PM Pushpa Kamal Dahal. PM Sushil Koirala and I also went there to convince the couple. But we could not succeed.”
The DPM said all necessary medicines were offered to Adhikari couple to save their lives. “We made every effort to save them. All medicines were administered. The drugs were very expensive but they did not reach his body from the veins. Even one day before his death, we requested him to end strike. Ultimately, Nanda Prasad died on 22 September.”
DPM Gautam said efforts are on to save the life of Ganga Maya, Nanda Prasad’s wife, who is still on hunger strike at Bir Hospital, Kathmandu.
“It is not possible to feed Ganga Maya through mouth. Therefore, we have arranged nutritious saline water for her to be administered with the help of medical staff.”
Nanda Prasad’s family has refused to collect his body from the mortuary of Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj, added the DPM. “In such a situation, the body is still lying at the hospital.”
Nanda Prasad and his wife Ganga Maya were on a hunger strike for the past 11 months demanding legal action against those involved in their son Krishna Prasad's murder.
The then Maoist outfit allegedly kidnapped and murdered the couple's 17-year old son in Chitwan on June 6, 2004.
Adhikari couple filed a criminal case at Chitwan district police against the culprits. However, a legal action against the perpetrators could never proceed properly amid the Maoists’ threat and obstruction.
The then Khil Raj Regmi government took the accused into custody and forwarded a legal action against them. However, the arrests met with strong protests from the Maoist leaders, due to which the legal process could never go further.
http://setopati.com/pathak-bichar/18162/
नन्दप्रसादको मृत्युमा न्यूनतम संवेदनसिलता त देखाउ
समाचार अनुसार माननीय उपप्रधानमन्त्री एवं कार्यवाहक प्रधानमन्त्री वामदेव गौतमले संसदको सामाजिक न्याय तथा मानवअधिकार समिति लाई भन्नुभएछ 'नन्दप्रसादले दुई अरब क्षतिपूर्ति मागे र नपाएपछि मरे ।'
सबैलाई सम्झना छ, नन्द प्रसादले 'अपराधीलाई कानूनको दायरामा ल्याउनुस, मलाई अनशन रोक्न भन्नै पर्दैन' मात्र भनिरहनुहुन्थ्यो। हो एकपटक अति कचकच गर्ने अल्लारे पत्रकारलाई उहाँले झर्किँदै भन्नुभएछ 'के को हर्जाना? कति हर्जाना? ल दुई अरब मागेर ल्याअो।' त्यसपछि- लौ धनको लालचीले राज्यबाट ठूलो रकम ऐँठन् पो अनसन बसेको रहेछ भन्दै स्याल हुइँया चलाइयो।
निर्दयी हल्लाबाट आक्रोसित नन्दप्रसादले टिपीएन दिन नाडीमा गाडीएको पाइप लुछेर फालिदिनु भयो। र, जानाजान मृत्युलाई नजिक्याउनु भयो। यो कुराको साक्षी गृहमन्त्रालय र प्रधानमन्त्री कार्यालयका तत्कालीन र वर्तमान पदाधिकारीहरु छन्।
उनको न्याय प्रतिवद्धताका साक्षी तीनजना पूर्व प्रधानमन्त्री र वर्तमान प्रधानमन्त्री लगायत कांग्रेस , एमालेका वर्मान र तत्कालिन उच्चपदस्थ नेता पनि छन् । एउटा सामान्य परिवारको नागरिकले असहज,निराशाजनक र आक्रोशित अवस्थामा के बोल्यो भन्ने आधारमा ब्यवस्थापिकामा अौपचारिक जवाफ दिइन्छ र संसदले चित्त बुझाउनेछ भन्ठान्ने हो भने यो त सरकारी निरंकुशताको पराकाष्ठा सावित हुने भयो।
बोलेकै भरमा राज्यको नीति निर्धारण हुने हो भने पूर्व प्रधानमन्त्री बाबुराम भट्टराईले 'पार्टीको निर्णयमा कृष्णप्रसाद उपर कारवाही गरिएकै हो। तागत भए मलाई समातेर देखा' भनेकै हुन। परिस्थितिजन्य प्रमाण संपुष्ट पार्नकालागि चितवन जिल्ला अदालतमा उहाँ लगायत एमाओवादीका नेता कार्यकर्ताको अदालत घेराउ , नारावाजी, भाषणका अभिलेख पनि दुरुस्त छन।
मुलुकका कार्यवाहक प्रधानमन्त्री ,वरिष्ठ उपप्रधानमन्त्री ,गृहमन्त्री र पार्टीका वरिष्ठ उपाध्यक्षबाट यो तहको आधारहीन तर्क संसदमा प्रस्तुत गर्दा सप्रमाण हुनुपर्छ भन्ने कुराको हेक्का राखिएन। मृतक प्रतिको सामान्य संवेदनशीलताको न्यूनतम ख्याल गरिएन। यदि यस्तै नेतृत्वको हातमा संवेदनशील जिम्मेवारी रहिरहने हो भने सिंगै नेपाल सरकारको नियतमाथि प्रश्न उठ्ने स्वाभाविक छ।
सम्पूर्ण सञ्चार जगतलाई कृपापूर्वक यो विषयमा गम्भीर बन्न म सार्वजनिक अपील गर्दछुँ। असत्यमाथि सत्यको विजयको महान चाडको बेला उपप्रधानमन्त्री गौतमको प्रतिकृया गैर जिम्मेवार मात्र होइन अधर्मी पनि छ।
