Why are ex-royal family still acting like royal family??
Even after they have become common citizens they are still acting like royal family. Even media is going after them all the time.
You have issues with media following ex-Royal family's actions, yet you do the same. Bit ironic, no?
Only currupt and opportunist self proclaimed leaders don't like Royal. Rest all do.
They have chamchaas all around them see them standing around rubbing their hands? I think those people have more hope for reinstatement of royalty than the king himself. mickymouse you are right, they are better off than most of the leaders thesedays.
Bokaman: If you know the definition of king you should know a king is never an EX-KING. They are not acting like royalties, they are royalties, it's in their blood.
Last edited: 05-Nov-13 10:32 AM
ghorle, you seem to be a hard core supporter of royalty. What is this royal blood you talking about? Is their blood different from yours and mine? Do they shit gold when they shit? They are just another human beings who happen to be born in the family by luck of birth. King is a status, you are not born a king. It is a status that is given by respect or taken by force and power. If someone cannot have either of those then they are not king anymore just like gyanendra was removed from his position. I don't understand why any commoner would take pride in royal blood. Maybe some people just want to live life of servitude washing someone's legs.
Have you ever heard of term "GENETICS"/ "Heredity" ? King is not a position, it's by birth. That's why a king is neve an ex-one. Understand this full and square. I like your ideology though, "All men are equal".Biologically it sounds true but not in other ways. Do you think a khate (street kid, no offence though) and a civilized kathmanduites like you are same??? No way!!
Last edited: 05-Nov-13 10:50 AM
Ghorleboka did you ever think what would happen if that khate kid and a civilized kid got switched at birth? The khate kid would be brought up as a civilized kid and he would become a civilized person but the civilized kid who got brought up as a khate would become a khate all along.
Even monkeys who are brought up as human beings learn to use ipad and such things. Why are you still stuck on royal blood like it's some kind of different specy.
You are contradicting your own logic. The people in picture are royalties because they were born in a family that was royal since BS 1616 (even before). So, what's your point here? Looks like your are befuddled.
Ghorlekabo, where are you getting these ideas man? We are saying this in the year 2000s?
What idea Kiddo? Can you be more specific?
Boka: I am not stuck on royal blood. Why people can't leave them living their lives in their own way? What's your problem if he received tika in a royal way? You can do same if you want and can. Probably you also speak all that Royal languages like "aisyos" "bhuja-jyunar" "!! So leave them alone.
Nepali ma euta ukhan chha ni " Oralo lageko mriga lai bachho le pani khedchha" you guys are doing the same.
Ghorlekabo
I agree with your last post. As if we have nothing else to do or no other issues to criticize, why do we have to keep bashing on them all the time? If you don't want them to get some attention and importance, then don't pay any. Why bother?
My question was about your idea on royal gene. You do know there's no such things. The idea of royal blood is also garbage. Sure, a person who grew up in royal environment might have developed some specific traits to be a leader (not always) but this is not because of a specific gene that triggers royal protocol. It's merely because of the environment and the fact that his/her parents were also leaders.
Argument is going offtrack from the OP, even though........
So you think environment does not influence behavior/ or gene? Don't you think long established behaviors (in many generations) are transferred to next future generation? Compare you and your father/ mother/ grandpas. You guys should have many common things like way of thinking, certain common behaviors etc.
Bokaman,
What one does in their private home is none of your fugging bidness. Even a fugger like you can act like a king in your own house if you wanted. Besides if people wanna be his chamcha, you cannot blame him. I am not a big fan of Gyaney but as a private citizen he can do whateva the fug he wants to at his house just like you and me. Whether he's acting like a king or sarki its none of your bidness.
Ghorlekabo,
Some Khate street kid can conquer some land/population and become king. The initial king was not born a king. He became one.
FYI
I don't see any problem with the video. People can do bhaitika however they want. Moreover, these royals have always done it that way. They don't know any other way.
बोको , have u ever seen some family of ज ब रा खानदान ? They still have 100's of servent and same life style. We cant do nothing on that and its same with our शाह bansa. If you are rich a$$ ( i bet you are not though) then u can have 50 people surrounding you . Doing ur job, chakadi. We cant say anything on that. Same rules applies there and for me personally he is still king .
मेरा साना दूःख ले आॅँजया मूलुक होईन.
What kinda stupid question is this? They will act whatever way they want to act.
Even bahun, chettris and jana jaatis refer to themselves in the royal pronoun thesedays. Your question should be why are non royals acting like royalty by copying royal language like aaisyosh, garisyosh, marji hosh, khaisyosh.
Kiddo: U gotta be royal to feel royal,
Royal stag can't trigger your royalty neither can black lebel
Please log in to reply to this post
You can also log in using your Facebook
